Re: Use "WAL segment" instead of "log segment" consistently in user-facing messages

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Use "WAL segment" instead of "log segment" consistently in user-facing messages
Date: 2022-07-21 04:20:12
Message-ID: 20220721.132012.1489731351047558143.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:25:33 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:55 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> PSA v7 patch set.

Thanks. Looks perfect, but (sorry..) in the final checking, I found
"log archive" in the doc. If you agree to it please merge the
attached (or refined one) and I'd call it a day.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix_log_WAL.patch text/x-patch 1.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-07-21 04:22:35 Re: i.e. and e.g.
Previous Message Amul Sul 2022-07-21 04:08:17 Re: GetStandbyFlushRecPtr() : OUT param is not optional like elsewhere.