Re: i.e. and e.g.

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: i.e. and e.g.
Date: 2022-07-21 03:20:30
Message-ID: CAFBsxsEg6LLAu1U0Mxh0TyYqg7STqAwPRgkpeVdD+Ys2_rbhgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 3:40 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> By the way, I forgot about back-branches. Don't we need to fix the
> same in back-branches?

The intent of the messages is pretty clear to me, so I don't really see a
need to change back branches. It does make sense for v15, though, and I
just forgot to consider that.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-07-21 03:44:26 Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2022-07-21 02:45:23 Re: Remove useless arguments in ReadCheckpointRecord().