From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back |
Date: | 2021-09-03 17:56:50 |
Message-ID: | 202109031756.d6li4szj5zje@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:46 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
> > These catversion bumps in branch 14 this late in the cycle seem suspect.
> > Didn't we have some hesitation to push multirange unnest around beta2
> > precisely because of a desire to avoid catversion bumps?
>
> This was for correcting a mistake (although the first commit turned out to
> be a mistake itself), so I understood it to be necessary.
A crazy idea might have been to return to the original value.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-09-03 18:27:25 | Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2021-09-03 17:50:45 | Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-09-03 18:10:09 | Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-09-03 17:56:16 | Re: prevent immature WAL streaming |