Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back
Date: 2021-09-03 17:50:45
Message-ID: CAFBsxsFB2OFLgaiwCR-3Tbb3nD16OXMwnqSC+2d_0Ze=p4qm1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:46 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:
>
> On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
> These catversion bumps in branch 14 this late in the cycle seem suspect.
> Didn't we have some hesitation to push multirange unnest around beta2
> precisely because of a desire to avoid catversion bumps?

This was for correcting a mistake (although the first commit turned out to
be a mistake itself), so I understood it to be necessary.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-09-03 17:56:50 Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-09-03 17:45:50 Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-09-03 17:56:16 Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-09-03 17:46:46 Re: prevent immature WAL streaming