| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers |
| Date: | 2021-09-03 18:10:09 |
| Message-ID: | 959c0d0f40df530f1c265dd70ee95a3c11e63602.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 18:24 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 6 Apr 2021, at 09:46, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 11:36 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> > > I don't know if Seamus is still working on that; if not, we might
> > > mark it as "returned with feedback".
> >
> > I have to agree given the time left.
>
> This thread has stalled and the patch no longer applies. I propose that we
> mark this Returned with Feedback, is that Ok with you Amit?
+1. That requires more thought.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-09-03 18:27:25 | Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-09-03 17:56:50 | Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back |