Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?

From: Rory Campbell-Lange <rory(at)campbell-lange(dot)net>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Date: 2020-11-10 17:24:01
Message-ID: 20201110172401.GB3156@campbell-lange.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

On 10/11/20, Daniele Varrazzo (daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
> version number?

Personally I think the "3" in "psycopg3" is clearer than simply
"psycopg" in relation to this being an evolution of the psycopg2
package.

Rory

In response to

Responses

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ethan Furman 2020-11-10 17:37:00 Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Previous Message Daniele Varrazzo 2020-11-10 17:12:05 psycopg is the new psycopg3?