Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?

From: Ethan Furman <ethan(at)stoneleaf(dot)us>
To: psycopg(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Date: 2020-11-10 17:37:00
Message-ID: e87ff316-e4a5-5905-deb9-b9d283dacd6a@stoneleaf.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

On 11/10/20 9:24 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 10/11/20, Daniele Varrazzo (daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
>> version number?
>
> Personally I think the "3" in "psycopg3" is clearer than simply
> "psycopg" in relation to this being an evolution of the psycopg2
> package.

And for me, a lone 3 at the end of a package name means Python 3 version.

Maybe skip the 3 and go straight to 4?

--
~Ethan~

In response to

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Federico Di Gregorio 2020-11-10 17:44:53 Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Previous Message Rory Campbell-Lange 2020-11-10 17:24:01 Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?