From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README |
Date: | 2018-06-20 03:59:04 |
Message-ID: | 20180620035904.GB19346@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:45:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I was a bit disturbed that you'd push information that was "just guessed",
>>> so I went and tried to run the ldap tests on a couple different platforms.
>
>> I assumed they were guessed at and at least the URLs checked out.
>> Should we remove the patch?
Yes, I was a bit surprised to see this patch pushed without checks about
what I guessed. I am not a user of those other platforms.
> No, but it needs some adjustments. I'll go fix what I checked.
c992dca2 did not change anything about ldap packages. Are the ones
listed for RHEL and FreeBSD correct?
> Do you have an opinion on what to say about build-time vs test-time
> requirements?
It could be an idea to mention that for those test suites Postgres needs
to be built with the appropriate --enable-XXX switches or they are just
skipped silently. Something in each README files across the lines is an
idea:
"This test suite requires PostgreSQL to be built with the configure
argument --enable-XXX or they are entirely skipped".
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-06-20 03:59:43 | Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-06-20 03:59:00 | Re: partition -> partitioned |