From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: partition -> partitioned |
Date: | 2018-06-20 03:59:00 |
Message-ID: | 20180620035900.qhpgo655oipymw2v@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Jun-20, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:02:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Noticed that the relevant code changed, so I rebased the patch. Also,
> > made a minor update to a nearby comment.
>
> That looks right to me as we speak about non-leaf partitions here.
> Alvaro, as 499be013 is yours, would you fix this inconsistency or should
> I? I could understand why things are confusing on HEAD, "partitioned"
> and "partition" have opposite meanings.
Hmm, will look.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-06-20 03:59:04 | Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-06-20 03:52:49 | Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons |