Re: partition -> partitioned

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: partition -> partitioned
Date: 2018-06-20 03:03:47
Message-ID: 20180620030347.GE20245@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:02:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Noticed that the relevant code changed, so I rebased the patch. Also,
> made a minor update to a nearby comment.

That looks right to me as we speak about non-leaf partitions here.
Alvaro, as 499be013 is yours, would you fix this inconsistency or should
I? I could understand why things are confusing on HEAD, "partitioned"
and "partition" have opposite meanings.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2018-06-20 03:52:49 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-06-20 02:46:24 Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade