Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README
Date: 2018-06-19 22:59:36
Message-ID: 23302.1529449176@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:45:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I was a bit disturbed that you'd push information that was "just guessed",
>> so I went and tried to run the ldap tests on a couple different platforms.

> I assumed they were guessed at and at least the URLs checked out.
> Should we remove the patch?

No, but it needs some adjustments. I'll go fix what I checked.

Do you have an opinion on what to say about build-time vs test-time
requirements?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-06-19 23:06:52 Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-06-19 22:48:43 Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README