Re: uninterruptible state in 10beta4

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: uninterruptible state in 10beta4
Date: 2017-09-14 09:07:13
Message-ID: 20170914090713.efxkjmgegyvife5v@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-09-13 17:53:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Indeed that seems plausible. I guess something like the attached should
> > fix the issue?
>
> Ah, I see you came to the same conclusion I did. But see comment
> about adding a comment.

I've pushed something - Not sure if you'd anything else in mind WRT
comment...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Hernandez 2017-09-14 09:21:52 Re: SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-09-14 09:06:41 Re: uninterruptible state in 10beta4