Re: uninterruptible state in 10beta4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: uninterruptible state in 10beta4
Date: 2017-09-13 21:53:44
Message-ID: 29335.1505339624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Indeed that seems plausible. I guess something like the attached should
> fix the issue?

Ah, I see you came to the same conclusion I did. But see comment
about adding a comment.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-09-13 22:43:33 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-09-13 21:51:48 Re: uninterruptible state in 10beta4