Re: uninterruptible state in 10beta4

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: uninterruptible state in 10beta4
Date: 2017-09-14 09:06:41
Message-ID: 20170914090641.j4va3oy2tervj3lx@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-09-13 14:46:08 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Indeed that seems plausible. I guess something like the attached should
> > fix the issue?
> >
>
> Yep, that fixes it.

Cool. Pushed. Thanks for the report!

Thanks,

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-09-14 09:07:13 Re: uninterruptible state in 10beta4
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-09-14 09:01:36 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED for range partition b