| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort |
| Date: | 2017-04-03 21:09:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20170403210904.vq62cpalhixtoleo@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2017-04-04 00:04:09 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > >Thank you!
> > >I already sent version of patch after David's reminder.
> > >Please find rebased patch in the attachment.
> >
> > Cool. I think that's still a bit late for v10?
> >
>
> I don't know. ISTM, that I addressed all the issues raised by reviewers.
> Also, this patch is pending since late 2013. It would be very nice to
> finally get it in...
To me this hasn't gotten even remotely enough performance evaluation.
And I don't think it's fair to characterize it as pending since 2013,
given it was essentially "waiting on author" for most of that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-04-03 21:11:33 | Re: parallel explain analyze support not exercised |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-04-03 21:07:24 | Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |