| From: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort |
| Date: | 2017-04-03 21:30:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdu+8BjKJ4OxvGCFHLqtiwFObVTzC5hz_NKHF4wtvVTe4A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2017-04-04 00:04:09 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > >Thank you!
> > > >I already sent version of patch after David's reminder.
> > > >Please find rebased patch in the attachment.
> > >
> > > Cool. I think that's still a bit late for v10?
> > >
> >
> > I don't know. ISTM, that I addressed all the issues raised by reviewers.
> > Also, this patch is pending since late 2013. It would be very nice to
> > finally get it in...
>
> To me this hasn't gotten even remotely enough performance evaluation.
>
I'm ready to put my efforts on that.
> And I don't think it's fair to characterize it as pending since 2013,
>
Probably, this duration isn't good characteristic at all.
> given it was essentially "waiting on author" for most of that.
>
What makes you think so? Do you have some statistics? Or is it just
random assumption?
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-04-03 21:33:34 | Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-03 21:30:08 | Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter |