Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Kam Lasater <ckl(at)seekayel(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!
Date: 2015-09-23 21:00:45
Message-ID: 20150923210045.GN3685@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kam,

* Kam Lasater (ckl(at)seekayel(dot)com) wrote:
> > ... The above-referenced individuals
> > would be the bug tracking system curators, of course. Unless it's got
> > serious technical issues, the infrastructure team will do our best to
> > support the choice. On the other hand, some of us would likely be
> > involved in bug curation also.
>
> Stephen,
>
> In digging around more I found this wiki page that seems to be the
> closest thing to a BT: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
>
> Is the curation already being done? If the contents of that wiki page
> were injected into a BT, would that be enough of a start?

If you look at what happens on the -bugs mailing list, you'll see very
quickly that a bug tracker and the Todo wiki page are very different.
Perhaps the Todo could be squeezed into a bug tracker, but many of the
items on there might well end up as 'wontfix' (to use the debbugs
lingo).

That is certainly not the same curation as what a BT would require.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2015-09-23 21:09:32 Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!
Previous Message Kam Lasater 2015-09-23 20:58:26 Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!