From: | Kam Lasater <ckl(at)seekayel(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
Date: | 2015-09-23 20:58:26 |
Message-ID: | CAG9n48-Cnx2i2vQLHEbHU+RjdOY17EquTJdaWJmwYRbrqVe3xQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > We have to use something OSS; open source projects depending on
> > closed-source infra is bad news. Out of what's available, I'd actually
> > choose Bugzilla; as much as BZ frustrates the heck out of me at times,
> > it's the only OSS tracker that's at all sophisticated.
Josh,
I'm not sure I agree here on the BT needing to be OSS. That said not
sure its my call :)
> ... The above-referenced individuals
> would be the bug tracking system curators, of course. Unless it's got
> serious technical issues, the infrastructure team will do our best to
> support the choice. On the other hand, some of us would likely be
> involved in bug curation also.
Stephen,
In digging around more I found this wiki page that seems to be the
closest thing to a BT: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
Is the curation already being done? If the contents of that wiki page
were injected into a BT, would that be enough of a start?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-09-23 21:00:45 | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-09-23 20:43:12 | Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements |