Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix
Date: 2015-03-22 01:46:55
Message-ID: 20150322014655.GE10795@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 02:41:44AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > Uh, I think you mean "number" here:
> >
> > <entry>Time stamp without milliseconds (as a numer)</entry>
> > -----
>
> Oh, right, that's a stupid typo.
>
> >
> > Also, what "number" do you mean? Unix time since 1970?
>
> Yes, the usual unix timestamp.

I think you need to find out where we reference that and use the same
wording.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-03-22 01:55:52 Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-22 01:46:24 Re: Zero-padding and zero-masking fixes for to_char(float)