| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix |
| Date: | 2015-03-22 01:55:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20150322015551.GD3636@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 02:41:44AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > > Uh, I think you mean "number" here:
> > >
> > > <entry>Time stamp without milliseconds (as a numer)</entry>
> > > -----
> >
> > Oh, right, that's a stupid typo.
> >
> > >
> > > Also, what "number" do you mean? Unix time since 1970?
> >
> > Yes, the usual unix timestamp.
>
> I think you need to find out where we reference that and use the same
> wording.
We use "Unix epoch" in various places.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-03-22 02:06:39 | Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL 9.4 mmap(2) performance regression on FreeBSD... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-03-22 01:46:55 | Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix |