Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date: 2014-04-21 21:21:20
Message-ID: 20140421212120.GB6140@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:08:51PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great
> but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that
> no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates
> helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL.

I don't think we would even implement a run-time control for Linux or
Windows for this, so I don't even think it is a FreeBSD issue.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-04-21 21:23:15 Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-04-21 21:13:16 Re: assertion failure 9.3.4