| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
| Date: | 2014-04-21 21:23:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20140421212315.GB2556@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alfred,
* Alfred Perlstein (alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org) wrote:
> On 4/21/14, 12:47 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Asking for help to address the FreeBSD performance would have
> >been much better received. Thanks, Stephen
>
> That is exactly what I did, I asked for a version of postgresql that
> was easy to switch at runtime between two behaviors.
>
> That would make it a LOT easier to run a few scripts and make sure I
> got the correct binary without having to munge PREFIX and a bunch of
> PATH and other tools to get my test harness to DTRT.
I'm sure one of the hackers would be happy to provide you with a patch
to help you with your testing.
That's quite a different thing from asking for a GUC to be provided and
then supported over the next 5 years as part of the core release, which
is what I believe we all thought you were asking for.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2014-04-21 21:25:31 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-04-21 21:21:20 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |