From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
Date: | 2014-04-21 21:25:35 |
Message-ID: | 20140421212535.GB4449@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-04-21 17:21:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:08:51PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> > If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great
> > but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that
> > no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates
> > helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL.
>
> I don't think we would even implement a run-time control for Linux or
> Windows for this, so I don't even think it is a FreeBSD issue.
I think some of the arguments in this thread are pretty damn absurd. We
have just introduced dynamic_shared_memory_type.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2014-04-21 22:08:45 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
Previous Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2014-04-21 21:25:31 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |