Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date: 2014-04-21 21:25:35
Message-ID: 20140421212535.GB4449@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-04-21 17:21:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:08:51PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> > If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great
> > but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that
> > no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates
> > helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL.
>
> I don't think we would even implement a run-time control for Linux or
> Windows for this, so I don't even think it is a FreeBSD issue.

I think some of the arguments in this thread are pretty damn absurd. We
have just introduced dynamic_shared_memory_type.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2014-04-21 22:08:45 Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2014-04-21 21:25:31 Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD