From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: logical changeset generation v6 |
Date: | 2013-09-23 08:46:34 |
Message-ID: | 20130923084634.GA15285@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-09-20 14:15:23 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I have a little bit of feedback that I forgot to mention in my earlier
> reviews, because I thought it was too trivial then: something about
> the name pg_receivellog annoys me in a way that the name
> pg_receivexlog does not. Specifically, it looks like someone meant to
> type pg_receivelog but fat-fingered it.
Yes, you're not the first to dislike it (including me).
pg_receivelogical? Protest now or forever hold your peace.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2013-09-23 08:50:08 | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
Previous Message | samthakur74 | 2013-09-23 07:56:13 | Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation |