Re: logical changeset generation v6

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v6
Date: 2013-09-23 16:47:05
Message-ID: 20130923164705.GI4832@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund escribió:
> On 2013-09-20 14:15:23 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > I have a little bit of feedback that I forgot to mention in my earlier
> > reviews, because I thought it was too trivial then: something about
> > the name pg_receivellog annoys me in a way that the name
> > pg_receivexlog does not. Specifically, it looks like someone meant to
> > type pg_receivelog but fat-fingered it.
>
> Yes, you're not the first to dislike it (including me).
>
> pg_receivelogical? Protest now or forever hold your peace.

I had proposed pg_recvlogical

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-09-23 16:54:46 Re: logical changeset generation v6
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-09-23 16:42:18 Re: File_fdw documentation patch to clarify OPTIONS clause