From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
Date: | 2013-09-23 08:50:08 |
Message-ID: | 524000C0.7070204@joh.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/23/13 6:40 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> After days I am thinking so it can be a good solution
>
> syntax - enhanced current RAISE
>
> RAISE ASSERT WHEN boolean expression
>
> RAISE ASSERT 'some message' WHEN expression
It looks like I'm losing this battle, but this syntax isn't too bad.
> and we can have a GUC that controls asserts per database - possibly
> overwritten by plpgsql option - similar to current plpgsql options
>
> assert_level = [*ignore*, notice, warning, error]
This sounds like a decent enhancement.
> p.s. clause WHEN can be used for other exception level - so it can be a
> interesting shortcut for other use cases.
This idea is good, I like it.
I could prepare a patch for this, unless someone else wants to?
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-09-23 08:57:01 | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-09-23 08:46:34 | Re: logical changeset generation v6 |