Re: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay
Date: 2013-01-28 14:16:00
Message-ID: 20130128141600.GB8209@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:48:56AM +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 28 January 2013 03:34, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > Would you commit to the same git repository the pgbench-tools data for the
> > graphs appearing in that blog post? I couldn't readily tell what was
> > happening below 16 clients due to the graphed data points blending together.
>
> I'm afraid that I no longer have that data. Of course, I could fairly
> easily recreate it, but I don't think I'll have time tomorrow. Is it
> important? Are you interested in both the insert and tpc-b cases?

No need, then.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hari Babu 2013-01-28 14:20:33 Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-01-28 14:12:33 Re: lazy_vacuum_heap()'s removal of HEAPTUPLE_DEAD tuples