Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request

From: Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: "'Boszormenyi Zoltan'" <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: "'Craig Ringer'" <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, 'Hans-Jürgen Schönig' <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "'Ants Aasma'" <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'PostgreSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Amit kapila'" <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request
Date: 2013-01-28 14:20:33
Message-ID: 00fd01cdfd62$a2e150b0$e8a3f210$@kommi@huawei.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday, January 19, 2013 11:23 AM Amit kapila wrote:
>On Saturday, January 19, 2013 4:13 AM Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Unfortunately, I won't have time to do anything with my lock_timeout
patch
>> for about 3 weeks. Does anyone have a little spare time to test it on
Windows?
>
>I shall try to do it, probably next week.
>Others are also welcome to test the patch.

I have carried out some windows testing of the lock timeout patch.

The extra tests which are carried out on the patch are attached in the mail.

Some observations on the patch:

1. Patch needs a rebase as it causing some rejections.
2. regress check failed because the expected ".out" file is not updated
properly.

Regards,
Hari babu.

Attachment Content-Type Size
lock_timeout_test.sql application/octet-stream 2.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Graham Little 2013-01-28 14:21:21 Re: pg_catalog
Previous Message Noah Misch 2013-01-28 14:16:00 Re: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay