Re: lazy_vacuum_heap()'s removal of HEAPTUPLE_DEAD tuples

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: lazy_vacuum_heap()'s removal of HEAPTUPLE_DEAD tuples
Date: 2013-01-28 14:12:33
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKrh07nt-8nnFaScNJwRvWRN3R148mRvwRvcdKabJjKUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23 January 2013 04:35, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:

>> Also, perhaps we should
>> consider Simon's one-liner fix for backpatching this instead of the
>> original patch you posted?
>
> I have no nontrivial preference between the two approaches.

Sorry, I didn't see this. I guess you saw I applied my one liner and
backpatched it.

I'm expecting to apply Noah's larger patch to HEAD with the suggested
edits. I'll do that last thing in the CF.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2013-01-28 14:16:00 Re: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-01-28 14:10:24 Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables