From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work |
Date: | 2012-12-01 19:35:57 |
Message-ID: | 20121201193557.GA15334@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2012-12-01 14:31:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2012-12-01 12:14:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It could do with some comments ;-)
>
> > Hehe, yes. Hopefully this version has enough of that.
>
> Hm, maybe too many --- I don't really think it's necessary for utility.c
> to provide a redundant explanation of what's happening.
Yea, was in doubt about that. Added it because it felt a bit strange
to pass down isTopLevel.
> Committed with adjustments --- mainly, the
> TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId test was flat out wrong, because it
> would accept a parent transaction ID as well as a subcommitted
> subtransaction ID. We could safely allow the latter, but I don't think
> it's worth the trouble to add another xact.c test function.
Yea, I plainly oversaw that it would be 'dangerous' for a toplevel txn
if a subtransaction aborts. I don't really see a usecase for supporting
subtxns either, so the current GetCurrentTransactionId() seems sensible.
Thanks.
Andres
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-12-01 20:24:57 | Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-12-01 19:34:46 | Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work |