From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work |
Date: | 2012-12-01 19:34:46 |
Message-ID: | 20121201193446.GA28206@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 02:31:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2012-12-01 12:14:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It could do with some comments ;-)
>
> > Hehe, yes. Hopefully this version has enough of that.
>
> Hm, maybe too many --- I don't really think it's necessary for utility.c
> to provide a redundant explanation of what's happening.
>
> Committed with adjustments --- mainly, the
> TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId test was flat out wrong, because it
> would accept a parent transaction ID as well as a subcommitted
> subtransaction ID. We could safely allow the latter, but I don't think
> it's worth the trouble to add another xact.c test function.
Thanks everyone. I can confirm that pg_upgrades make "check now"
passes, so this should green the buildfarm. Again, I aplogize for the
fire drill.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-12-01 19:35:57 | Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-01 19:31:03 | Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work |