| From: | "Joshua J(dot) Kugler" <joshua(at)eeinternet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: "private" installation of postgres |
| Date: | 2010-09-08 19:39:37 |
| Message-ID: | 201009081139.37871.joshua@eeinternet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Scott Ribe elucidated thus:
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Personally, though, I think it's easier to change the default port
> > number and not worry about sharing /tmp. Changing the port is a
> > good idea anyway to avoid any possible conflicts on shared memory
> > IDs.
>
> I was planning on changing the default port number (I forgot to state
> that in my email), but also moving the socket dir just to be really
> sure.
If you do a private socket dir, and connect via that, you don't even
have to listen on a TCP port at all.
j
--
Joshua Kugler
Part-Time System Admin/Programmer
http://www.eeinternet.com - Fairbanks, AK
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ID 0x73B13B6A
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A.M. | 2010-09-08 19:48:57 | exclusion constraint with overlapping timestamps |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-08 19:30:15 | Re: Memory Errors |