Re: "private" installation of postgres

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>
To: "Joshua J(dot) Kugler" <joshua(at)eeinternet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "private" installation of postgres
Date: 2010-09-09 00:03:18
Message-ID: CC78C800-219B-4C83-8A66-9137F147C00D@killerbytes.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sep 8, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:

> If you do a private socket dir, and connect via that, you don't even
> have to listen on a TCP port at all.

Right, but it's hardwired in that the IP port number is used as part of the domain socket name, and according to Tom also used somehow in shared memory segments.

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message zhong ming wu 2010-09-09 00:23:20 variable name in plpgsql
Previous Message Sam Nelson 2010-09-08 22:55:33 Re: Memory Errors