Re: "private" installation of postgres

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "private" installation of postgres
Date: 2010-09-08 01:19:38
Message-ID: 8B2D1C2B-4879-434A-BCA3-682A97296EDC@killerbytes.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sep 7, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Personally, though, I think it's easier to change the default port
> number and not worry about sharing /tmp. Changing the port is a good
> idea anyway to avoid any possible conflicts on shared memory IDs.

I was planning on changing the default port number (I forgot to state that in my email), but also moving the socket dir just to be really sure.

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Hill 2010-09-08 01:31:47 Postgres 32bit on Windows 64bit, related components
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-08 01:09:12 Re: "private" installation of postgres