From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Progress indication prototype |
Date: | 2010-08-17 17:52:28 |
Message-ID: | 20100817175228.GY26232@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Alex Hunsaker (badalex(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:31, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > * Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> >> Other comments?
> >
> > Will we be able to use it for psql while keeping just one database
> > connection? I assume the answer is 'no', but it sure would be nice..
>
> I think thats something that could be worked out in libpq after this
> patch. Although I'd bump your nice to an awesome.
If it was configurable via \set and I could drop it in my .psqlrc, and
it knew not to only do it after a few seconds (otherwise it'd be far too
much)...
I don't like how the backend would have to send something NOTICE-like, I
had originally been thinking "gee, it'd be nice if psql could query
pg_stat while doing something else", but that's not really possible...
So, I guess NOTICE-like messages would work, if the backend could be
taught to do it.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-17 17:54:46 | Re: Todays git migration results |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-08-17 17:50:34 | Re: security label support, part.2 |