| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Progress indication prototype |
| Date: | 2010-08-18 20:57:27 |
| Message-ID: | 1282165047.27661.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2010-08-17 at 13:52 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I don't like how the backend would have to send something NOTICE-like,
> I had originally been thinking "gee, it'd be nice if psql could query
> pg_stat while doing something else", but that's not really possible...
> So, I guess NOTICE-like messages would work, if the backend could be
> taught to do it.
That should be doable; you'd just have to do some ereport(NOTICE)
variant inside pgstat_report_progress and have a switch to turn it on
and off, and have psql do something with it. The latter is really the
interesting part; the former is relatively easy once the general
framework is in place.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-08-18 20:59:27 | Re: Progress indication prototype |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-08-18 20:57:13 | Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this? |