| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: security label support, part.2 |
| Date: | 2010-08-17 17:50:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20100817175034.GX26232@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Kevin Grittner (Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov) wrote:
> >Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > Let's not build the complication of dealing with inheiritance/
> > child relations into the external security system when we're in
> > the middle of trying to get rid of that distinction in core PG
> > though.
>
> I didn't realize we were trying to do that. I know we're working on
> making partitioning easier, but there hasn't been a decision to stop
> supporting other uses of inheritance, has there?
No.. and I'm not sure we ever would. What we *have* done is removed
all permissions checking on child tables when a parent is being
queried..
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-08-17 17:52:28 | Re: Progress indication prototype |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-17 17:26:19 | Re: Todays git migration results |