| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |
| Date: | 2010-02-20 19:03:08 |
| Message-ID: | 201002201903.o1KJ38w17399@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >> This discussion is sounding very design-ish, which makes me think we
> >> should just leave things unchanged for 9.0 and have external regression
> >> test designers work around this problem in their Makefiles, as Alvaro
> >> suggested.
> >
> > I would have said that some time ago, except that I think we have a
> > "must fix" issue here: isn't pg_upgrade broken for any database
> > containing plpgsql? A decent solution for that probably will allow
> > something to fall out for the regression test problem too.
>
> There is also the "must fix" issue with pg_regress.
Why? My pg_regress runs just fine. If you are talking about 3rd party
modules, I suggested conditional Makefile rules.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-02-20 19:25:56 | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-02-20 18:40:34 | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |