| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |
| Date: | 2010-02-20 18:40:34 |
| Message-ID: | 6C5666B3-665B-482D-A06C-93795FA8D538@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 20, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This discussion is sounding very design-ish, which makes me think we
>> should just leave things unchanged for 9.0 and have external regression
>> test designers work around this problem in their Makefiles, as Alvaro
>> suggested.
>
> I would have said that some time ago, except that I think we have a
> "must fix" issue here: isn't pg_upgrade broken for any database
> containing plpgsql? A decent solution for that probably will allow
> something to fall out for the regression test problem too.
There is also the "must fix" issue with pg_regress.
Thanks,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-20 19:03:08 | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-20 17:57:55 | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |