Re: a few crazy ideas about hash joins

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> > Are there any TODOs here?
> >>
> >> I'd say that all of the items listed in my original email could be
> >> TODOs. ?I'm planning to work on as many of them as I have time for.
> >> Ramon Lawrence is also working on some related ideas, as discussed
> >> upthread. ?AFAICS no one has expressed the idea that anything that's
> >> been talked about is a bad idea, so it's just a question of finding
> >> enough round tuits.
> >
> > OK, would you please add them to the Index/Hash section of the TODO
> > list; ?I am afraid I will not do the justice.
>
> I think perhaps Optimizer / Executor would be more appropriate, since
> these are not about hash indices but rather about hash joins. I will
> look at doing that.

Yes, please.

> Also I think the last item under Index / Hash is actually NOT done,
> and belongs in the main index section rather than Index / Hash.

Yep, I didn't realize that editing "Index" also does the subsections,
while editing the subsections doesn't edit the upper level.

> The first item in the Index / Hash section doesn't really look like a
> TODO, or at the very least it's unclear what the action item is
> supposed to be.

Yep, remove, thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +