From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Lawrence, Ramon" <ramon(dot)lawrence(at)ubc(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: a few crazy ideas about hash joins |
Date: | 2009-04-08 03:02:54 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070904072002t15f9ff4i474c957f58dd7baa@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think perhaps Optimizer / Executor would be more appropriate, since
>> these are not about hash indices but rather about hash joins. I will
>> look at doing that.
>
> Yes, please.
Done. See what you think...
>> Also I think the last item under Index / Hash is actually NOT done,
>> and belongs in the main index section rather than Index / Hash.
>
> Yep, I didn't realize that editing "Index" also does the subsections,
> while editing the subsections doesn't edit the upper level.
Heh. I'd write some webapps to do some of these things, but I haven't
been able to interest anyone in providing me with a
postgresql.org-based hosting arrangement.
>> The first item in the Index / Hash section doesn't really look like a
>> TODO, or at the very least it's unclear what the action item is
>> supposed to be.
>
> Yep, remove, thanks.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-04-08 03:03:47 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-04-08 02:42:51 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |