From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Lawrence, Ramon" <ramon(dot)lawrence(at)ubc(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: a few crazy ideas about hash joins |
Date: | 2009-04-07 21:52:12 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070904071452o7b2736f1wabcb63bcbc14d86a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Are there any TODOs here?
>>
>> I'd say that all of the items listed in my original email could be
>> TODOs. I'm planning to work on as many of them as I have time for.
>> Ramon Lawrence is also working on some related ideas, as discussed
>> upthread. AFAICS no one has expressed the idea that anything that's
>> been talked about is a bad idea, so it's just a question of finding
>> enough round tuits.
>
> OK, would you please add them to the Index/Hash section of the TODO
> list; I am afraid I will not do the justice.
I think perhaps Optimizer / Executor would be more appropriate, since
these are not about hash indices but rather about hash joins. I will
look at doing that.
Also I think the last item under Index / Hash is actually NOT done,
and belongs in the main index section rather than Index / Hash.
The first item in the Index / Hash section doesn't really look like a
TODO, or at the very least it's unclear what the action item is
supposed to be.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2009-04-07 21:56:04 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-04-07 21:15:01 | Re: Bug of ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT |