| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity |
| Date: | 2008-01-14 00:31:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20080114003105.GB17558@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Guillaume Smet escribió:
> On Jan 13, 2008 10:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I think this would be a helpful change, but some might find it
> > confusing. Thoughts?
>
> If possible, something like:
> autovacuum: VACUUM ANALYZE foo.bar
> could be less confusing.
> It's weird to just add AUTO in front of the query.
Whether the string is "AUTO " or "autovacuum: " seems rather the same
thing to me :-) I agree with the general idea. I think "autovacuum: "
makes it clearer that it's not part of the actual command syntax, so
maybe I'll put half a vote for that option.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-14 00:31:08 | Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-01-14 00:30:44 | Re: Postgresql Materialized views |