Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity
Date: 2008-01-13 22:14:32
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10801131414v583539c2j297567bab63fcf5b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 13, 2008 10:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think this would be a helpful change, but some might find it
> confusing. Thoughts?

If possible, something like:
autovacuum: VACUUM ANALYZE foo.bar
could be less confusing.
It's weird to just add AUTO in front of the query.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannes Dorbath 2008-01-13 22:14:34 Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-13 21:59:47 Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity