Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity
Date: 2008-01-14 00:42:07
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10801131642q398d35cbibbe91bf4112ffd79@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 14, 2008 1:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Whether the string is "AUTO " or "autovacuum: " seems rather the same
> thing to me :-) I agree with the general idea.

Yeah, forgot to mention I find it a very good idea.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-14 00:52:15 Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-14 00:31:08 Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4