Re: Reviewing ftp tree

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reviewing ftp tree
Date: 2007-11-05 23:53:15
Message-ID: 20071105155315.467ad335@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:48:01 -0400
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> - --On Monday, November 05, 2007 15:35:03 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
> <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was digging through our ftp tree today and noticed this:
> >
> > binary/
> > drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 17 02:05 v8.2.5
> > drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Oct 8 10:32 v8.3beta1
> > drwxr-xr-x 5 ftp ftp 512 Nov 2 06:33 v8.3beta2
> >
> > v8.2.5/
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 linux
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 ftp ftp 512 Sep 18 06:04 win32
> >
> > linux/
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 rpms
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 srpms
> >
> > It seems to me that this should be something more like:
> >
> > packages/v8.2.5/linux/rh/rpms|srpms
> > /suse/rpms|srpms
> > win32/
> > win64/
>
> 'k, you've lost me ... we dont' have win64 binaries, else Dave would
> have put that directory in (I suspect?), and is anyone doing suse
> binaries?

Well win64 and suse were to illustrate how the tree could expand over
time. You are right that we don't currently have win64, but with 8.3 we
support VC++ so we could in theory support win64 for 8.4.

Secondly I have been playing with building SuSE rpms to keep that tree
up to date for older SuSE releases and I could see it extending from
there as well (for example postgresql 8.2 for Ubuntu Dapper).

The real difference here is that binary is misleading as we have source
packages in there and it isn't really binary as much as just a package
repo.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> I'm not sure what changes you are proposing here ...
>
> - ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org) Email .
> scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQFHL6ux4QvfyHIvDvMRAiQRAJ4iZlzoZg9P54YIue2ZEhURgRSLIgCcD+Ej
> /7lq2/tTelw2TrdtpdCJN4A=
> =Rv+G
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our
> list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHL6zuATb/zqfZUUQRAqonAJ9aAEbDAVY4YLr7kdHbK7NEHR+ZWQCfcpdU
YiGRSD29g7kKr7mNhGhYjO8=
=WX8B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-11-06 01:09:11 Re: Reviewing ftp tree
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-11-05 23:48:01 Re: Reviewing ftp tree