Re: Reviewing ftp tree

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Monday, November 05, 2007 15:53:15 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> Well win64 and suse were to illustrate how the tree could expand over
> time. You are right that we don't currently have win64, but with 8.3 we
> support VC++ so we could in theory support win64 for 8.4.
>
> Secondly I have been playing with building SuSE rpms to keep that tree
> up to date for older SuSE releases and I could see it extending from
> there as well (for example postgresql 8.2 for Ubuntu Dapper).
>
> The real difference here is that binary is misleading as we have source
> packages in there and it isn't really binary as much as just a package
> repo.

I'm not against it, just wanted to clarify what you were envisioning ...

+1 from here ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHL7634QvfyHIvDvMRAoI/AJ9K5Ka+I16JNkv8Gm6FxbKu2S63IwCggF79
89IlkzhOfnWr6Nu3zGSoO9w=
=VEN5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----