Re: Reviewing ftp tree

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Monday, November 05, 2007 15:35:03 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I was digging through our ftp tree today and noticed this:
>
> binary/
> drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 17 02:05 v8.2.5
> drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Oct 8 10:32 v8.3beta1
> drwxr-xr-x 5 ftp ftp 512 Nov 2 06:33 v8.3beta2
>
> v8.2.5/
> drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 linux
> drwxr-xr-x 2 ftp ftp 512 Sep 18 06:04 win32
>
> linux/
> drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 rpms
> drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 srpms
>
> It seems to me that this should be something more like:
>
> packages/v8.2.5/linux/rh/rpms|srpms
> /suse/rpms|srpms
> win32/
> win64/

'k, you've lost me ... we dont' have win64 binaries, else Dave would have put
that directory in (I suspect?), and is anyone doing suse binaries?

I'm not sure what changes you are proposing here ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHL6ux4QvfyHIvDvMRAiQRAJ4iZlzoZg9P54YIue2ZEhURgRSLIgCcD+Ej
/7lq2/tTelw2TrdtpdCJN4A=
=Rv+G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----