| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: COPYable logs status |
| Date: | 2007-06-08 15:04:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20070608150426.GE17144@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:29:03AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The only solution that I can see is to invent some sort of simple
> protocol for the syslogger pipe.
Perhaps having a look at the current IETF syslog discussion will be
helpful in that case? (I know it's not directly relevant, but maybe
others have thought about some of these things. I haven't read the
draft, note.)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-20
There's also the discussion of reliability in RFC 3195:
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3195.txt
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
--George Orwell
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-06-08 15:06:09 | Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-06-08 15:00:50 | Re: BUG #3326: Invalid lower bound of autovacuum_cost_limit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-06-08 15:06:09 | Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-06-08 15:00:50 | Re: BUG #3326: Invalid lower bound of autovacuum_cost_limit |