From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints |
Date: | 2007-06-08 15:06:09 |
Message-ID: | 20070608150609.GF17144@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:33:50AM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> they'd take care of that as part of routine server setup. What wouldn't
> be reasonable is to expect them to tune obscure parts of the kernel just
> for your application.
Well, I suppose it'd depend on what kind of hosting environment
you're in (if I'm paying for dedicated hosting, you better believe
I'm going to insist they tune the kernel the way I want), but you're
right that in shared hosting for $25/mo, it's not going to happen.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-06-08 15:14:52 | Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-06-08 15:04:26 | Re: COPYable logs status |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-06-08 15:14:52 | Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-06-08 15:04:26 | Re: COPYable logs status |