Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints
Date: 2007-06-08 15:06:09
Message-ID: 20070608150609.GF17144@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:33:50AM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> they'd take care of that as part of routine server setup. What wouldn't
> be reasonable is to expect them to tune obscure parts of the kernel just
> for your application.

Well, I suppose it'd depend on what kind of hosting environment
you're in (if I'm paying for dedicated hosting, you better believe
I'm going to insist they tune the kernel the way I want), but you're
right that in shared hosting for $25/mo, it's not going to happen.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-08 15:14:52 Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-06-08 15:04:26 Re: COPYable logs status

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-08 15:14:52 Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-06-08 15:04:26 Re: COPYable logs status